|
|
 |
|
| November
10, 2003; Volume IX, Issue 22 |
| Senate
Environment Committee Braces for Debate on
TEA-21 Renewal Plan
Leaders
of the Senate Environment and Public Works
Committee have scheduled November 12 for action
on their renewal plan for key portions –
highways and research titles – of the
nation’s surface transportation law, known as
TEA-21.
Late
last month, the top leaders of the Committee –
Senators Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Jim Jeffords (I-VT),
Kit Bond (R-MO) and Harry Reid (D-NV) –
unveiled their bipartisan agreement, breaking an
impasse that has dominated the Committee’s
efforts for some time. The Committee leaders now
hope to jumpstart the TEA-21 renewal process by
approving the panel’s legislative package
before Congress adjourns November 21.
The
477-page legislative proposal largely follows
many of the key elements of the
Administration’s renewal proposal, known as
SAFETEA, which was unveiled earlier this year.
In fact, the Senate bill uses the SAFETEA title
for its proposal. While drawing extensively from
the Administration’s renewal plan such as its
legislative emphasis on project delivery and
clean air conformity changes, it does depart on
program funding levels, proposing substantially
higher spending levels than the President’s
plan. The
Senate panel leaders have not provided details
on how their plan’s higher funding levels will
be supported, although it appears that new taxes
have been ruled out and it is widely speculated
that general funds are being targeted.
In
addition to the lengthy proposal, Committee
leaders November 10 released details of their
own amendments, known as the “managers’
amendment”, which outlines 66 pages of
amendments to their bipartisan agreement. The
bill and the managers’ amendment will be
brought before the 19-member Senate Environment
and Public Works Committee for their
consideration and approval on November 12.
Already, scores of additional amendments are
being prepared by Committee members to offer
during the Committee markup.
The
Committee leadership plan generally sets forth
how the lion's share of TEA-21’s program
resources are to be allocated among states and
within the states, including key policies and
rules governing how federally-assisted projects
at the state and local level move forward.
Transit funding is handled by the Senate Banking
Committee, which plans no action until next
year.
STPP
coalition partners are now focusing on a number
of specific amendments to the legislation, while
evaluating what the overall bill and its lengthy
managers' amendment propose for existing
policies and practices. Among the coalition
partners' concerns are adequate funding for the
CMAQ program anticipating additional areas
coming into the program, higher funding for the
newly-created Safe Routes to School program and
increased investment (i.e. PL funds) in the
capacity of metropolitan planning organizations
so they can shoulder new responsibilities.
The
Committee’s aggressive schedule to bring the
bill up for action before Congress adjourns was
driven by public criticism by highway industry
leaders, state transportation departments and
others that key Congressional panels had failed
to move forward with legislative proposals
providing for a multi-year renewal of TEA-21.
The nation’s surface transportation law
expired September 30; last month current law
programs and policies were extended for five
months, expiring again on February 29, 2004.
To
view a copy of the letter sent to EPW members by
the STPP Coalition visit http://www.transact.org/PDFs/Senate_EPW_letter.pdf

|
House
Proposal Expected Before Congress Adjourns
Leaders
of the House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee are continuing their work on their
renewal plan and have pledged to release details
of their TEA-21 renewal plan next week before
Congress adjourns.
Unlike
the Senate package, the House panel bill is not
expected to deal with all of the key issues
before the Committee, focusing largely on the
program structure and funding issues, including
distribution of funds to the states.

|
Conferees
Expected to Finalize FY'04 Transportation
Appropriations Bill
House
and Senate appropriators are expected to meet
this week to reach an agreement on the Fiscal
Year 2004 Transportation, Treasury and
Independent Agencies bill.
STPP
and several partner organizations recently wrote
to Senators Richard Shelby and Patty Murray
(D-WA), leaders of the Senate Appropriations
Subcommittee on Transportation, to convey the
coalition’s priorities during upcoming
conference committee negotiations. The key
issues raised in the STPP partners’ letter
were Amtrak, the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute
Program (JARC), New Starts, Scenic Byways and
funding for the Federal Transit Administration.
To
view a copy of the letter, go to:
http://www.transact.org/PDFs/Senate_Appropriations_letter.pdf

|
Nations Mayors Stand with Chairman
Young and House Panel Leaders
Citing
growing maintenance costs and demand for new
transportation priorities and job creation,
leaders of The U.S.
Conference of Mayors (USCM) November 6 pledged
to support a $375 billion funding level for
highway and transit programs at an event with
Chairman Don Young (R-AK), Ranking Member James
Oberstar (D-MN), Subcommittee Chair Tom Petri
(R-WI) and Subcommittee Ranking Member William
Lipinski (D-IL), the four key leaders of the
House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee.
USCM President and Hempstead Mayor James Garner, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels
and other Conference leaders indicated the
nation’s mayors support a higher funding level
because of the transportation needs at the local level.
Local governments own 75% of 4 million
miles of highway and roads; over 50% of all
bridges; and manage about 90% of the nation’s
transit systems.
Also speaking were Akron Mayor Donald
L. Plusquellic, who discussed the need for more
local empowerment over regional transportation
decisions, and Long Beach Mayor Beverly
O’Neill, who recommended greater
federal support for intermodal facilities like
the Alameda Corridor project in order to handle
growing freight traffic.
“The
support of the Mayors is vital to our effort to
provide the federal funding needed to address
America’s growing congestion and highway
safety problems,” noted Chairman Don
Young (R-AK).
Although
the House leaders noted mayors and other local
elected officials are key to engaging Members of
Congress to successfully pass a $375 billion,
six-year transportation
bill, they have not announced their intentions
on how they will address the mayors’ call
for increased local decision-making
authority.
For
more information on The U.S. Conference of
Mayor’s transportation event, visit www.usmayors.org.

|
Houston
Voters Approve Light Rail Plan, Other Measures
Considered Around the Nation
The
nation's 4th largest city reached a turning
point last week when Houston
voters
approved a $640 million bond measure to
accelerate construction of light rail, as well
as authority to build a total of 72 miles of new
rail service and expanded bus service.
The November vote specifically provides
funding to build and operate 22 miles of new
light rail and expand bus service over the next
ten years, linking residents to major
destinations and employers such as the central
business district, the University of Houston
downtown campus, Rice University, Texas Medical
Center, and several shopping malls.
Passed by 52 percent of voters, the
proposition will fill the local funding gap for
the next phase of the $7.5 billion “Metro
Solutions” regional transit plan.
“It’s a victory for our city, it’s a victory
for the next generation and generations to
come,” expressed Houston Mayor Lee Brown at a
celebration event on 11/4/03.
The overarching “Metro Solutions” plan includes
a total of 72 miles of light rail, 8 miles of
commuter rail, and a 50 percent increase in bus
service. METRO
developed the plan for “options,
accountability, and affordability” with the
input of citizens at more than 175 public
meetings over a year and a half period.
Supporters included elected officials
from all levels of government, developer and
business-based interest groups such as Houston
Association of Realtors, Greater Houston
Partnership, and Central Houston, Inc. and a
spectrum of transit allies including the Houston
Chronicle, NAACP – Houston Branch, Harris
County AFL-CIO, the Sierra Club, and Mothers for
Clean Air.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) and
Representative John Culberson (R-TX) have stated
they will uphold their promise to secure federal
funding for the METRO Solutions plan despite
prior efforts to block funding.
The 7.5 mile downtown line scheduled to
open in Houston on January 1, 2004 is being
built entirely with local funds.
METRO may go back to voters to move
forward with the third phase of the plan in 2009.
For
more information on the Houston “METRO
Solutions” plan, visit http://www.hou-metro.harris.tx.us.
Grand
Rapids Voters Boost Transit Funding
In action on other ballot issues, voters in Grand Rapids and Tucson also
made decisions on transit investment. A proposal to increase funding for public transit in Grand
Rapids, MI won handily in last week's elections,
by a margin of 2 to 1. The six cities served by
the Grand Rapids transit agency passed a smaller
property tax increase in 2000, which this vote
continued and increased. This year's proposal
had an improved margin over the original 2000
vote, something supporters say is due to the
improved transit service that has been visible
since 2000. The current proposal is expected to
generate over $9 million next year.
The
coalition in support of the proposal included
churches, city leaders, riders, ordinary
citizens, and several prominent businesses in
the area, including the Grand Rapids Chamber of
Commerce, and Mayor John Logie of Grand Rapids.
For more on the transit services funded with the
proposal, see http://www.grata.org/.
Tucson
Voters Reject Light Rail Initiative
In
Tucson, a proposal to fund improved and expanded
transit services through a sales tax increase
was rejected by 63 percent of voters.
In voting precincts close to the city's
core, support for the transit plan was
overwhelming – in some precincts 70 percent
and higher voted for the measure. The proposal
was defeated mainly by voters in outlying areas,
where opposition correlated roughly with
distance to downtown. Because of the high
support in areas that would be served by the
proposed light rail corridor, supporters are now
considering creating a special tax district for
the measure.
Tucson
has voted down several transportation sales tax
measures in the past: in 1986, 1990, and 2002.
Last year's proposal, a well-funded,
city-sponsored transportation sales tax
initiative, failed in every precinct of the city.
Supporters of this year's initiative say that
they have tapped into a transportation formula
that can garner support at least in some areas,
and that any future transportation plans will
have to include alternative transportation
components to win over the voters. For more on
the initiative, see http://www.savetucson.org/.
For
more details on 2003 transit referenda, visit
the Center for Transportation Excellence at www.cfte.org

|


Orlando
Voters Reject Sales Tax for 20-Year Mobility
Plan
In
action last month, Orlando voters rejected a
half-cent sales tax increase that would have
raised $2.6 billion over 20 years on a broad
package of transportation projects.
The “Mobility 20/20 Plan” plan called
just over half of the tax revenues to be spent
on road and highway expansions, including
widening Interstate 4 by adding four toll lanes
to the existing eight free lanes.
Other projects included $300 million for
improving rail traffic flow and grade
separations, $45 million for building sidewalks,
$15 million for 20-30 miles of trails, $20
million for transit capital improvements such as
new buses and shelters, and $60 million for
installing “smart systems” for timing lights
to manage traffic flow.
About $400 million was to be dedicated to
the development of two new light-rail lines and
one commuter rail line.
The
measure’s defeat surprised business and
political leaders, who had predicted an easy win
based on polls showing high public support.
Boosters spent $1.5 million promoting the
measure. But 23% of voters turned out to reject
the plan by a margin of 54% to 46%. Critics of
the plan included anti-tax groups who said they
were able to tap into a general mistrust of
government along with an anti-tax sentiment
among the public in down economic times.
The plan was also criticized by
faith-based and social equity advocates for
dedicating a greater share of tax revenues to
road expansions than transportation
alternatives, and for having little to offer
low-income residents.
Many opponents were also critical of the
plans for light-rail, saying it was a potential
boondoggle.

|
|