|
|
   |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| February
6, 2003; Volume 9, Issue 4 |
New
STPP Report Rates States on Spending Priorities:
Recommendations Issued for Increased
Accountability A
new report issued by STPP last week finds that
federal transportation funding made available
under ISTEA and TEA-21 has helped repair the
nation's roads and bridges and sparked progress in curbing
transportation-related air pollution.
STPP's analysis credits the targeted
funding made available through ISTEA &
TEA-21 for much of the improvements,
particularly the Interstate Maintenance, Bridge
repair, and Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality (CMAQ) improvement programs.
Yet the STPP report
also found that despite gains made in many
states, there could have been greater improvement had Congress closed
accounting loopholes in the current TEA-21 law
that now allow states to shift funds out of road and
bridge repair, traffic safety and clean air
accounts. In the ten year period from FY'92 -
FY'01, states
neglected to spend a combined $7.9 billion in
road and bridge repair funds, $2.2 billion in
clean air money and $1 billion in traffic safety
funding in favor of other priorities.
The report details five recommendations
to help spend existing transportation funds more
effectively and build more accountability into
transportation finance.
STPP has released the
ten years of federal spending data in the latest
issue of Progress, in addition to detailed state
by state spending, condition and performance
data in a new series of four
"transportation decoders" focused on
road repair, bridge repair, traffic safety and
clean air. Electronic versions of Progress and
the decoders are available at www.transact.org.

|
Bush
FY'04 Budget Ups Highways Slightly, No Change for
Transit
President
Bush's budget request for the federal fiscal
year that begins October 1, 2003 (FY'04) was
unveiled February 3.
The plan calls for a 6 percent increase
in highway spending and no increase in federal
transit spending.
Working from TEA-21's guaranteed spending
level of $27.6 billion for FY'03, the final year
of the six-year TEA-21 law, the Administration
is requesting a 6 percent increase in highway
spending for FY'04, budgeting $29.2 billion for
the core highway programs - the National Highway
System, Interstate Maintenance, Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality improvement, the
Surface Transportation Program, Bridge and
Minimum Guarantee - and other spending programs subject
to state obligation limitations. In contrast,
the budget calls for no increase in transit
spending for FY'04; it simply extends TEA-21's
final year (FY'03) level of $7.23 billion into
the new fiscal year.
Budget Includes Elements of
Administration's TEA-21 Renewal Plans
The
Administration's budget detail also offers
insights into some of the Administration's plans
for TEA-21 renewal.
For example, the Administration budget is
proposing to make the heavily-earmarked Jobs
Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) program part
of a broader, annual formula allocation to states for
certain transit activities. This would meld JARC
resources with non-urbanized transit funds, and
funds for the elderly and
persons with disabilities under the President's
New Freedom Initiative to improve transportation
services for persons with disabilities. Under
current law, JARC is a stand-alone program
within U.S. DOT where states and local providers
seek funding on a competitive basis.
Another
TEA-21 renewal proposal will lower the federal share for
"new starts" projects (e.g. rail
transit and other fixed guideway systems) to 50
percent, from the current law share of 80
percent. The federal share for highway projects
will remain at 80 percent.
While the
budget does include an increase in funding for
the "new starts" program, calling for
$1.5 billion, $300 million more than the last
year of TEA-21, the Administration wants to
expand the eligibility for the program,
including a small starts program and adjustments
to facilitate Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects.
The increase in funding is made possible
by the assumed elimination of the Federal
Transit Administration's "bus
discretionary" program. In addition, most
of the funding for the new starts program is
slated to come from general fund revenues, not
the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust
Fund.
At the
budget briefing, DOT officials indicated their
renewal plans are expected to call for the
continuation of the firewalls to ensure
predictable highway and transit funding over
the life of the renewal.
Amtrak
Gets Less Than Requested
The
Administration's FY'04 budget includes a request
of $900 million for the new fiscal year, which
is about one-half the level that Amtrak President David Gunn
has been seeking to
continue his efforts to stabilize and improve
services on the nation's passenger rail
corporation. In their budget detail materials,
the Administration's budget assumes the
elimination of a number of long distance trains
and substantially different financial agreements
with state partners to continue these services,
among with other changes in Amtrak's operations.
For
additional details on the President’s FY’04
budget request for U.S. DOT, click
here.

|
House
Chairman Young Reacts to Budget Plan  House
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Chairman Don Young (R-AK), who will lead the
House effort to renew TEA-21, reacted February 3
to the President's budget plan and its proposed
funding levels for surface transportation
investment. "Unfortunately, the President's budget
proposal for highways and transit will not close
the funding gap that is needed to address the
nation's infrastructure.
In fact, the Department of Transportation
reported in its 2002 Conditions and Performance
Report that the needs of the nation's highway
and transit infrastructure are greater than
twice the number in the President's
Budget," he said.
Young also applauded the
Administration's planned initiative to provide $1
billion for ready-to-go highway projects that
address traffic bottlenecks and improve
infrastructure conditions.
"Overall, we look forward
in the coming year to working with the
Administration, our colleagues in the House and
Senate, and the transportation industry to
authorize a highway and transit program that
will meet America's growing infrastructure
needs. To
do less will allow congestion and gridlock to
tighten their hold and strangle the U.S. economy
and the American people," Young noted in a
statement released on the budget plan.
For
Chairman Young’s full February 3, 2003
statement, click
here.

|
Congress
Works to Finalize Current FY'03 Funding
Attention
being paid to the new budget has overshadowed
continuing efforts on Capitol Hill to craft a
final agreement on funding for the current
fiscal year (FY'03) which began four months ago.
Congress is now considering further short-term
extensions of the "continuing
resolution" providing legislators more time
to reach an agreement on final spending levels
for the remainder of this fiscal year. Such an
agreement is expected within the next week or
two.
In regards to
transportation in the FY'03 budget, there are
still several unresolved issues. The Senate has
provided $1.2 billion for Amtrak for FY'03,
substantially more than the House level. Amtrak
President David Gunn has indicated that anything
less than the $1.2 billion will force him to
begin shutting down the nation's passenger rail
system beginning by late spring or summer. The Senate provided $31.8 billion for
highway spending, with the House following the
TEA-21 baseline of $27.6 billion. Funding for
transit is set at the TEA-21 baseline of $7.23
billion in both bills, although the Senate
spending bill currently includes an
across-the-board reduction in all domestic
spending.

|
Senate
Democratic Stimulus Package Released
Senator
Tom Daschle (D-SD) unveiled the Senate
Democratic Stimulus Plan in Cleveland on January
24, which called for $141 billion in 2003, and
$112 billionover ten years.
Earlier that week, Daschle met with
MOSES, a Detroit faith-based organization, who
urged him to maintain a 1:4 ratio for transit
and highways.
The plan specifically calls for $4
billion for transportation infrastructure,
including $2.9 billion in highways, $700 million
for transit, and $400 million for airport
construction.
Daschle’s plan also calls for the
elimination of state matching requirements.
In
December, Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) released a
similar economic stimulus package calling for
$160 billion in 2003 and $135 billion over ten
years. Baucus’
plan gives $4.3 billion for highway
construction, and no provision for transit and
airport projects. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|