Arizona's Spending
of
Federal
Transportation Dollars
|
Providing Choice
|
|
Bicycle & Pedestrian Spending Per Capita
(Avg. annual, 1990 to 1999):
|
$0.26
|
|
Transit Spending per Capita (Avg. annual, 1990 to 1999):
|
$8.54
|
The Share Going to Choice, and How It
Has Changed
|
|
Percent of All Federal Funds to Alternative
Modes*
(Avg. 1990 and 1991)
|
Percent of All Federal Funds to Alternative Modes*
(Avg. 1998 and 1999)
|
Change
|
13.50%
|
12.22%
|
-9.49%
|
|
*Alternative Modes includes
transit, biking and walking facilities, as well as "travel
demand management" (TDM) techniques to promote the use of these
modes and carpooling, vanpooling, and teleworking.
|
Indications of the Commitment to
Providing Choice:
States can spend "flexible" transportation money on
any type of transportation project. Spending of this money
indicates the priority the state has put on providing choice.
|
|
Percent of Flexible Funds Used for
Alternative Modes (Avg. 1992 to 1999):
|
1.80%
|
|
States can indicate their commitment to
certain programs by how much of the funds authorized for that
program are actually used (obligated).
|
|
Obligation Rate
(1992 to 1999)
|
Transportation Enhancements
|
CMAQ
|
NHS
|
49.64%
|
97.31%
|
94.18%
|
Fixing It First
|
The Share Going to Fixing Roads, and How
It Has Changed:
|
|
Percent of Federal Highway
Funds to Maintenance
(Avg. 1990 and 1991)
|
Percent of Federal Highway
Funds to Maintenance
(Avg. 1998 and 1999)
|
Change
|
49.61%
|
44.31%
|
-10.69%
|
Protecting Public Safety and the
Environment
|
|
Safety Spending per Capita (Avg. annual,
1990 to 1999):
|
$1.10
|
|
Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ)
funds are most effective when used for projects that provide
long-term air quality benefits.
|
|
Percent of CMAQ Funds Spent on Projects
with Long-Term Benefits
(Avg. 1990 to 1999):
|
57.56%
|
|