3/20/2000
Driven to Spend: Chapter One: Transportation Is Expensive
Personal and public expenditures on transportation amounted to almost $805
billion in 1998.1 The vast majority, 84 percent, came out of the pockets
of individuals. Households spent more than five times as much of their own money
on transportation, more than $675 billion in 1998, than the government spent on
all roads, highways, and transit systems combined ($128 billion). These two
figures are not independent: Government investments in transportation have a
direct bearing on what families end up paying to move around their communities.
In this report, we focus on personal expenditures, and on how decisions about
growth and the public investment in transportation have influenced how, and how
much, Americans spend on transportation each year.
Within the family budget, transportation looms large. Transportation,
including the ownership and operation of vehicles and expenses for public
transit, is the second largest expense category for most American households.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Survey,
out of every dollar American households spend annually, almost 18 cents go to
getting around in their communities. Only shelter eats up a larger chunk of
expenditures (19¢), with food a distant third place (13.7¢).2 (See
Figure A)
|
Figure A. How Households Use Each Dollar
|
|
|
|
Transportation spending is second
only to shelter. |
| [Source: Consumer Expenditure Survey,
1998.] |
What Households Buy with their Transportation Dollar
In 1997 and 1998, the typical American household spent an average of $6,312
out-of-pocket per year on transportation. The vast majority of that expense,
almost $6,200, went towards buying, fueling, and maintaining personal cars and
trucks. Vehicle purchases, both new and used, comprise 46 percent of
transportation expenditures. Seventeen percent of transportation expenditures
went to gasoline, motor oil, and taxes on those products. Vehicle insurance, at
twelve percent, takes the next largest chunk, followed by maintenance and
repairs at ten percent. In all, about 98 percent of all personal transportation
expenses goes toward automobiles. The smallest piece of the pie went to public
transportation, which made up just two percent of personal transportation
expenditures. This analysis, which focuses on everyday travel, excludes air-fare
and cruise ship expenses.
|
Figure B. Transportation Expenses
|
|
|
|
The fixed costs of vehicles
dominate transportation spending. |
| [Source: Consumer Expenditure Survey,
1998.] |
Once car ownership is a necessity, it is relatively difficult to bring down
transportation expenses. The costs of owning and driving a personal vehicle do
vary for different car models: the American Automobile Association finds that it
costs between 43.9 cents and 61.7 cents per mile, depending on car size and
type, to own and operate a car.3 But beyond this initial choice of the
type of car to buy, costs are hard to control. According to the Federal Highway
Administration, vehicle operation costs, which vary with the amount of driving,
account for just one-quarter of total auto costs. Three-quarters of all
automobile expenses stem from the fixed cost of simply owning a car. While a few
places are experimenting with ways to bring down these fixed costs (see Appendix
B), the need to own a car leaves many people with few ways to save.
High Transportation Costs Hit Poor Families the Hardest
Forty percent of American households spend more than one-quarter of their
income on transportation, and most of that expense goes to vehicles. The
Consumer Expenditure Survey shows the lower the household income, the greater
the portion of income that is devoted to transportation. Households earning
between $12,000 and $23,000,spend 27 cents of every dollar they earn on
transportation. For the very poor, transportation costs are an even greater
burden; these households spend 36 cents of every dollar they earn on
transportation, most of it on vehicles. Sixty-two percent of households in this
group own at least one automobile. Households in the highest income group, those
making at least $60,500 per year, spend just 14 percent of their income on
transportation.
|
Figure C. Transportation Spending by Income
|
|
|
| The poorest Americans use the
highest portion of their income on transportation. |
| [Source: Consumer Expenditure Survey,
1998.] |
Transportation Costs Are Rising
When looked at over time, the data show a disturbing trend of increasing
transportation expenses. Since the early 1990’s, the Consumer Expenditure
Survey has shown that the portion of total spending devoted to transportation
has increased steadily. During the eight-year period between 1990 and
1998, the portion of total expenditures going to transportation grew by an
average of 8.1 percent in the metro areas surveyed, from 16.8 percent of
expenditures to 18.2 percent. Meanwhile, the portion going to shelter also
increased, but at a lower rate (6.7 percent). If this trend continues, spending
on transportation could surpass spending on shelter.
In a handful of metro areas – Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, Pittsburgh,
Atlanta, St. Louis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Kansas City – this is already
the case (see Table 1). Households in Houston, for example, spent more than
$8,800 on transportation in 1998, while they spent not quite $6,500 on shelter.
One might expect that this gap reflects Houston’s cheap housing stock. The gap
actually reflects just how expensive transportation is in Houston – Houston
households spent almost 27 percent more than the national average on
transportation, and only two percent less than the national average on shelter.
We’ll discuss why this might be the case in Chapter Three.
Table 1. Spending More on Transportation than Shelter
|
Metro Area (MSA) |
Household Expenditures on
Transportation |
Household Expenditures on Shelter |
|
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX |
$8,840 |
$6,536 |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX |
$8,717 |
$7,200 |
|
Pittsburgh, PA |
$6,331 |
$5,329 |
|
Atlanta, GA |
$8,513 |
$7,716 |
|
St. Louis, MO-IL |
$6,489 |
$5,911 |
|
Kansas City, MO-KS |
$6,489 |
$6,036 |
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI |
$8,683 |
$8,135 |
|
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL |
$5,864 |
$5,761 |
|
Cleveland-Akron, OH |
$6,384 |
$6,345 |
Other analysis, conducted independently, reaffirms this assertion. A recent
report by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found that a
six-fold increase in the amount of driving between 1950 and 1993 resulted in an
increase in transportation costs in many cities, although less so in communities
with strong public transit systems4.
| How to Save: Teaching by Example
Seattle has launched a program that is paying a few families to leave
their second car at home, to show the rest of the city how to save money
by getting along with just one car. Under the program, "Way to Go
Seattle," participating households must pledge to leave their extra
car parked for six weeks, and will receive $85 a week in return for
keeping a diary of the alternative ways they traveled - by bus, foot,
bicycle, or taxi. The diaries will help the city craft an educational
campaign to show how people can use other means of travel and save money
if they get rid of their second car. For more information, visit http://www.cityofseattle.net/carsmart/waytogo.htm. |
The Surface Transportation Policy Project is a nationwide network of more than 800
organizations, including planners, community development organizations, and advocacy groups,
devoted to improving the nation’s transportation system.
|