|
Transportation
planners have long grappled with the distinction between mobility and
access. At the beginning of
the federal road policy era in the 1920’s, these concepts seemed
inseparable—providing mobility by getting “farmers out of the mud”
meant access to urban markets.1
Since then, the relationship has become more complicated.
For example, because of worsening congestion and longer trip
lengths, expanding highway capacity (and in theory, mobility) doesn’t
always improve one’s ability to obtain desired goods, services and
information.
Moreover,
it is now easier than ever to gain access without mobility, thanks to the
recent rise in communications technologies.
Phone calls, faxes, emails, and the telecommunications network
provide rapid access to people, goods, and information. And we’ve only
just begun; today’s emerging fiber infrastructure has the theoretical
capacity to transmit three million large books—more than the inventory
of Amazon.com—on a single fiber-strand per second.2
The
relationship between concrete/asphalt and electronic access networks is
complex. For example,
electronic demands (for goods and services) can both substitute and
stimulate use of the transportation system. Calling a colleague on the
phone can save a trip, while ordering an iMac can stimulate a trip.
Nonetheless,
transportation policy makers and system designers have great opportunities
to improve access through the digital network.
The appropriate framework for this is the Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS), the “official” program for organizing and
deploying digital technologies.
Motor
Mobility to Bit Access
For
the past decade, ITS has enjoyed strong federal funding for planning,
programming and deployment. Major
urban areas nationwide now have a basic technological infrastructure
supporting their surface transportation system, a general architecture and
planning process to integrating their information system into traffic
management systems, and a range of technology services providing drivers
with information about traffic and travel conditions.
These
reflect the original focus of ITS programs:
better mobility, i.e. improving traffic flows, vehicle crash
avoidance, linking users with different transportation modes.
Given
the new popularity and power of Internet use, ensuring better access to
goods and services is now a more appropriate focus.
Here are some actions that can help fulfill this objective:
An Infrastructure for Access.
ITS infrastructure should enhance the access needs of those who
live and work near electronic networks.
ITS broadband networks can facilitate community digital access in
places that currently lack good surface transportation options (such as
the Compton Blue Line, Connecting Minnesota, the Great American Station
Foundation’s “e-Stations” concept) or,
on the wireless side, access to mayday and other safety services
(for example, e-911).
Traveler Information. The next generation of traveler information services should
deliver real-time conditions, alternative travel modes, and ideally,
pricing information and value packages for a range of needs: commuting, senior access, student specials, etc.
The Seattle Smart Trek system is a standard bearer on real-time
information for multiple modes.
Environmentally-Friendly Trip Substitution.
Perhaps the greatest access gains can be achieved by providing
people with more access choices, including environmentally-friendly
options. For example, people
with telework options and flexible work schedules could tap into traffic
information before they depart on their commute.
E-commerce delivery systems could include environmentally-friendly
or energy-efficient shipping options.
Newly designed communities can use electronic connectivity to
enhance the types of services that are provided in pedestrian
environments.3
To
date, most transportation technology planning has focused on system-level
mobility. Our new challenge
is to bring transportation services and options to a personal level so
that people can have more access choices.
Such a system would enable better telework opportunities, would
contain more useful information about various travel options, and would
allow for environmentally-beneficial e-commerce delivery systems.
Since the U.S. Department of Transportation is just beginning a new
ten-year planning effort for ITS, the time is right to move these
technologies to favor access.
Notes
1.
Thomas Lewis, Divided Highways, New York: Viking, 1997.
2.
George Gilder, Telecom, New York: Viking, 2000.
3.
Thomas Horan
and Kimberly, Telecommunications Design Studio Findings, Report
prepared in collaboration with the Humphrey Institute, University of
Minnesota, for the Department of Transportation, December, 2000.
|