|
Back to Mean Streets 2004 Home
Page
Mean Streets 2004
How Far Have WE Come?
Executive Summary
America’s streets are growing meaner for pedestrians
The
Surface Transportation Policy Project has been reporting on
pedestrian fatalities in the United States for ten years
now. Our first report, produced with Environmental Working
Group and published in 1996, examined pedestrian fatalities
for the period 1986 through 1995. Since that first Mean
Streets was published, STPP has issued three updates, each
looking at a two-year period. This year, STPP is taking the
opportunity with the publication of our fifth edition of
Mean Streets to reflect on the trends in pedestrian safety
over the past decade.
A total
of 51,989 pedestrians have died over the ten years from 1994
through 2003. In raw numbers, pedestrian fatalities have
declined over this period by approximately 12.8 percent.
This is good news, except when you consider that the rates
of walking have declined even faster. The U.S. Census
Bureau’s decennial data on commuting provides the most
reliable benchmark of walking over time. According to that
data set, the percentage of commuters who walked to work
declined by 24.9 percent from 1990 to 2000.
In fact,
walking is by far the most dangerous mode of travel per
mile. Although only 8.6 percent of all trips are made on
foot, 11.4 percent of all traffic deaths are pedestrians.
And while the 2001 fatality rate per 100 million miles
traveled is 0.75 for public transit
riders, 1.3 for drivers
and their passengers, 7.3 for passengers of commercial
airlines,
the fatality rate for walkers is an astonishing 20.1 deaths
per 100 million miles walked.
|
|
Fatality rate per 100 million miles traveled |
|
Public transit |
0.75 |
|
Passenger cars and trucks |
1.3 |
|
Commercial airlines1 |
7.3 |
|
Walking |
20.1 |
Yet,
across the country, there is some decidedly good news for
pedestrian safety. Many metropolitan areas, some prompted
by STPP’s Mean Streets reports, have taken steps to make
their regions more walkable. Upon his election in 1999,
Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson elevated pedestrian
safety and walkability to among his adminstration’s highest
priorities. His safety campaign and other efforts have
proven effective, with pedestrian fatalities in the Salt
Lake City area declining by more than 44 percent.
Unfortunately, not all areas have followed Salt Lake City’s
lead. Pedestrian safety continues to worsen in many metro
areas. This report takes a hard look at the trends across
the country and identifies the metro areas where the streets
have grown meaner, as well as those where the streets have
become friendlier to walkers.
The Pedestrian Danger Index (PDI) shows where it is most
dangerous to step out of your door to take a walk. It looks
at the rate of pedestrians deaths, relative to the amount
that people walk in a given metro area. In order to assess
whether pedestrian safety has improved or worsened over the
past ten years, STPP calculated a PDI for the period 1994 to
1995 and for the period 2002 to 2003, and looked at the
change in those two figures. According to this analysis,
pedestrian safety has improved markedly in the following
large metropolitan areas: Salt Lake City; Portland; Austin;
New Orleans; Los Angeles; Dallas-Ft. Worth; Norfolk-Virginia
Beach; San Francisco; Hartford; and Phoenix. In contrast,
the large metropolitan areas which have seen their streets
grow meaner are: Orlando; Richmond, VA; Memphis; Denver;
Grand Rapids, MI; Columbus, OH; Pittsburgh; Buffalo; West
Palm Beach; and Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater. (Please
note that the Pittsburgh area ranks very low in its PDI.)
|
Metropolitan Area |
1994-1995 PDI |
2002-2003 PDI |
PDI Change |
|
Metro areas
with the greatest improvements in pedestrian safety |
|
Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT MSA |
106.2 |
59.3 |
-44.2% |
|
Portland-Salem, OR-WA CMSA |
64.3 |
43.0 |
-33.1% |
|
Austin-San Marcos, TX MSA |
77.0 |
61.9 |
-19.6% |
|
New Orleans, LA MSA |
101.9 |
82.5 |
-19.1% |
|
Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA CMSA |
101.3 |
82.5 |
-18.6% |
|
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX CMSA |
123.1 |
103.7 |
-15.8% |
|
Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, VA-NC MSA |
46.6 |
40.5 |
-13.3% |
|
San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA CMSA |
56.7 |
49.4 |
-12.9% |
|
Hartford, CT NECMA |
56.9 |
49.5 |
-12.9% |
|
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ MSA |
133.2 |
117.2 |
-12.0% |
|
|
|
Metro areas
with the greatest declines in pedestrian safety |
|
Orlando, FL MSA |
111.8 |
243.6 |
117.9% |
|
Richmond-Petersburg, VA MSA |
41.4 |
70.5 |
70.4% |
|
Memphis, TN-AR-MS MSA |
111.6 |
159.1 |
42.6% |
|
Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO CMSA |
46.3 |
64.9 |
40.0% |
|
Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI MSA |
55.0 |
75.8 |
37.8% |
|
Columbus, OH MSA |
30.1 |
40.9 |
35.9% |
|
Pittsburgh, PA MSA |
21.6 |
29.3 |
35.8% |
|
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY MSA |
41.5 |
55.8 |
34.5% |
|
West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL MSA |
163.5 |
209.9 |
28.3% |
|
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater, FL MSA |
169.8 |
215.3 |
26.8% |
America’s meanest streets
4,827
people died in the year 2003 while walking down the street
in the United States, down slightly from the toll of 4,919
in 2002. An estimated 70,000 pedestrians were injured in
traffic crashes during each of those two years. In addition
to the ten-year pedestrian safety trend analysis, this
report looks at where Americans are dying as pedestrians,
what makes the streets dangerous for those on foot, and how
the states are responding to those dangers.
The PDI
shows that the most dangerous places to walk are
metropolitan areas marked by newer, low-density
developments, where wide, high-speed arterial streets offer
few sidewalks or crosswalks. The most dangerous
metropolitan area for walking in 2002/2003 was Orlando,
followed by Tampa, West Palm Beach, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale,
Memphis, Atlanta, Greensboro, NC, Houston, Jacksonville, FL,
and Phoenix.
Lack
of investment
Unfortunately, few federal transportation dollars are being
spent on pedestrian safety in many of the metro areas most
in need of improvement. In a separate analysis, STPP
reviewed expenditures of federal transportation funds over
the last twelve years (fiscal years 1992 through 2003), and
found that in four of the top ten areas – Columbus, Denver,
Memphis and West Palm Beach – showing the greatest declines
in pedestrian safety, state spending of federal dollars on
creating a safe walking environment actually declined over
time.
During
the most recent spending period (under the federal surface
transportation law, which covered fiscal years 1998 through
2003), funds expended in six of these metropolitan areas was
well below the national average of 82 cents per person each
year. In fact, spending in the ten areas listed above was
still below the national average, at 73 cents per person for
pedestrian facilities or safety programs.
Because
state Departments of Transportation typically control the
vast majority of federal funds (94 cents of every federal
transportation dollar), federally-funded roads have tended
to be designed and built with little regard to local needs.
This often results in wide, high-speed arterials (the type
of roads that the state DOTs are most familiar with) running
through towns and neighborhoods. Unfortunately, these are
the same roads which are the most deadly for pedestrians.
STPP’s
analysis shows that the states are not investing enough of
their federal transportation dollars to protect people who
walk. While 11.4 percent of all traffic deaths are
pedestrians (12.9 percent if bicyclists are included), less
than one percent (0.9 percent) of federal transportation
construction, operations, and maintenance funds are spent to
ensure a safe walking environment. No state spends more
than 2.5 percent of their federal transportation funds on
sidewalks, crosswalks, traffic calming, speed humps,
multi-use paths, or safety programs for pedestrians or
cyclists. This is in spite of a more than 40 percent
increase in federal transportation dollars to the states in
the last six years, and regulations that make it easier to
use what were once “highway funds” on a wider variety of
transportation projects, including transit improvements and
pedestrian facilities that support transit and other users.
In
addition, over the past 12 years the states have lost the
opportunity to spend $1.69 billion on bicycle and pedestrian
projects available through federal law. The program,
Transportation Enhancements, is designed to support bicycle
and pedestrian projects, among other investments. Many
states have chosen to leave this money on the table rather
than do the projects that could make walking and bicycling
safer for everyone.
Communities with streets built for speed, not people
Rather
than investing in pedestrian safety, many state departments
of transportation often choose to build roads that turn out
to be dangerous for people on foot. In looking at the types
of roads on which pedestrians are killed, STPP’s analysis
found that 14.6 percent of pedestrians deaths occur on
Interstates, freeways, and expressways, 31.1 percent on
other principal arterials, 20.8 percent on minor arterials,
11.9 percent on collectors, and 21.6 percent on local
roads. The deadliest roads tend to be high-speed arterials,
with few accommodations or protections
– such as sidewalks or crosswalks – for pedestrians.
Overall,
the nation’s transportation networks have been largely
designed to facilitate high speed automobile traffic,
treating our communities and pedestrian safety particularly
as an afterthought. Streets designed with wide travel lanes
and expansive intersections have been the norm or local
zoning and parking requirements that don’t account for
pedestrians and public transportation riders is too often
standard practice. Private sector actors routinely design
malls, shopping centers and housing for automobile access,
without suitable facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists or
transit users. Importantly, communities with a good design
and a focus on features that support travel options from the
start don't have to be fixed later, reducing the dangers to
pedestrians today and into the future.
People at higher risk
For the
first time, the federal fatality statistics include a look
at the racial and ethnic background of those killed. While
the record is not complete (race data is not available for
27 percent of deaths, and ethnicity data is not available
for 28 percent of deaths), it does show that ethnic and
racial minorities are over-represented in pedestrian
deaths. African-Americans make up 19 percent of pedestrian
deaths, even though they represent just 12.7 percent of the
total population.
Children
also face higher risks as pedestrians. Pedestrian injury is
the third leading cause of unintentional injury-related
death among children ages 5 to 14. This is true even though
the evidence shows that fewer children are walking. Only
about 14 percent of children’s trips to school are made on
foot, down from 50 percent in 1969. Forty percent of
parents asked about the barriers to children walking to
school cited traffic as a major concern. About 70 percent
of children’s trips are made in the back seat of a car.
The
health risk of walking less
While
walking presents some dangers, not walking may hold more
hazards. As children have been walking less, the percentage
of children who are obese or overweight has soared. The
same is true for adults: the portion of people who walk to
work dropped by 25 percent between 1990 and 2002, at the
same time that the percentage of the population who are
obese jumped 70 percent. The Surgeon General’s Call to
Action on the obesity epidemic calls for providing safe and
accessible sidewalks, walking, and bicycle paths. Physical
inactivity is also associated with a heightened risk for
many diseases, including heart disease, diabetes and
pancreatic and breast cancer.
The
medical costs of physical inactivity are estimated at about
$76 billion per year. Meanwhile, the federal transportation
program, which weighs in at about $46 billion per year,
spends less than one percent of that – about $240 million
annually – on creating safer places to walk and bicycle.
Automobile-oriented transportation networks are sometimes so
seamless that commuters can go directly from the garages of
their homes to the basements in their worksites without so
much as a short walk. The same attention needs to be
directed to making other trips more seamless, including the
pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities that both
encourage walking and make walking safer. This means
wider sidewalks (if there are sidewalks at all), improved
lighting, safe crossings and attractive transit wait areas
can combine to improve the experience of walking.
Community designs that emphasize other travel options –
walking, biking and transit – are needed to support
additional activity and better health.
Recommendations for state and federal action
Americans strongly support greater investment and commitment
to pedestrian safety. More than two-thirds (68 percent) of
Americans favor putting more federal dollars toward
improving walkability, even within a constrained budget.
The effort to create a better walking environment would be
much more effective if local, state and federal
transportation agencies embraced walking as a transportation
priority by taking the following actions:
Design-Related
·
Fix What We Have
to correct the many deficiencies that now exist in the
nation’s transportation infrastructure, by developing
pedestrian action plans, adopting “fix-it-first”
policies, establishing Safe Routes to School programs,
ensuring a “fair share” commitment of transportation
funds to pedestrian safety needs and giving more funding to
local agencies who own most of the federal-aid and other
system roads.
·
Complete Streets
so that
transportation projects at every level of government –
Federal, State and local – provide appropriate facilities
and accommodations to serve pedestrians, bicyclists and
transit users.
Operations
·
Tame Motor
Vehicle Traffic by ensuring safer motor vehicle
operation, removing unsafe drivers from the roads and
deploying new technologies to enhance enforcement such as
photo speed enforcement and so-called red-light cameras.
·
Promote Walking
by emphasizing the public health, economic development, and
transportation benefits of walking, including more focused
attention and greater resource commitments to encourage
people of all ages to walk more.
|