
THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION REPORT
Surface Transportation Policy Project March 2001 Newsletter
HIGHLIGHTS:
LOBBY ORGANIZES 'CALIFORNIA COMMUTER ALLIANCE'
ENERGY CRISIS THREATENS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
FRESNO EYES TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX
RENEWAL
PLUS:
VALLEY RESIDENTS ENVISION MORE WALKABLE FUTURE QUOTABLE
STATE BRIEFS
STATE ROAD LOBBY ORGANIZES 'CALIFORNIA COMMUTER
ALLIANCE'; NEW PRO-HIGHWAY CAMPAIGN IN THE WORKS
A powerful coalition of road builders and construction
contractors calling themselves the 'California Commuter
Alliance' are pouring thousands of dollars into campaigns in
the Bay Area and Sacramento to stifle new transit plans and
boost highway spending as both regions prepare their long
range transportation plans. The campaign kicked off in
February with a litany of radio and newspaper ads blaming
'paid anti-highway activists' for slashing road funding,
forcing people onto transit and "pouring billions into a
network of buses that will have to sit in traffic alongside
your car." It also uses a widely circulated but erroneous
statistic that claims highway capacity has grown only 8
percent statewide since 1975. That number includes only
state-owned highways, including many local two lane state
roads but missing many county-owned expressways and arterials,
further complicated by the fact that the state relinquishes
hundreds of miles of roadways each year to local government
control. Since 1984, major arterial and freeway capacity in
California's metro areas has grown by 24 percent while
population has grown by 28 percent according to more reliable
annual report published by the Texas Transportation Institute.
Critics of the Alliance charge that not only is their
message out of touch with the general public (76 percent of
Bay Area residents in a recent poll support significant
transit funding increases versus just 36 percent favoring new
highways), but that their stated goal of securing more road
and bridge repair funding is misleading since most of their
members lobby primarily for new construction projects. The
Alliance for Jobs specifically excluded local street and road
maintenance from their demand for a minimum expenditure of 40
percent on capital projects as part of Alameda County's
recently approved Measure B transportation sales tax package.
The Alliance's ad campaign is also strikingly similar to
those being unveiled in other several other regions of the
country. In Atlanta, the Georgia Highway Contractors
Association is funding a controversial campaign blaming
environmental groups for the region's miserable air quality
and loss of federal highway funds. "Environmentalists are
telling us how to live our lives, preventing us from driving
cars and forcing us to live downtown," says one of the
Atlanta television ads. That line, accompanied by several
images of Latinos and African- Americans boarding a city bus,
has drawn sharp attacks from several civil rights and social
justice groups. The coordination of the pro-highway ad
campaigns in key regions throughout the U.S. is thought to be
part of a larger lobbying strategy by national road
construction groups aimed at convincing President Bush to roll
back air quality laws and environmental protections on
federally funded transportation projects.
For more information about the California Commuter Alliance
visit http://www.rebuildca.org
or call the Alliance at 510.452.1661.
Back to Top
ENERGY CRISIS THREATENS TRANSPORTATION
FUNDING PROPOSALS, EVEN AS FIRST MEASURE PASSES KEY COMMITTEE
As the state's escalating energy crisis threatens both the
political ambitions of California Governor Gray Davis as well
as the rapidly shrinking budget surplus, several major
transportation funding proposals that will rely on the
provision of general revenues from the state sales tax are
facing an even steeper uphill climb. AB227, SB829, ACA9,
AB1020 and AB321 all seek to provide new transportation
funding through the diversion of the state sales tax on
gasoline or new car sales from the general fund into
transportation programs (see CTR v02n02).
Despite increasingly strong signals from the administration
that any bills tapping into the general fund will fail to
receive the governor's signature, AB227 (Longville) was
approved by the Assembly Transportation Committee by a
unanimous 17-0 vote on March 19th. The dwindling budget
surplus makes passage of any of the major transportation
funding proposals virtually impossible this year, and may mean
several of the various bill sponsors would look to place
initiatives on the November 2002 ballot.
To follow each of the individual legislative proposals,
subscribe to regular bill updates available free of charge at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov
. Also visit http://www.transact.org/ca/state_leg.htm
STPP's updated analysis throughout the 2001 session.
Back to Top
ON HEELS OF BAY AREA VICTORIES, FRESNO
COUNTY NEXT TO EYE RENEWAL OF TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX
After two stunning victories last November where both
Alameda and Santa Clara counties easily surpassed the
seemingly impossible two-thirds vote threshold, Fresno County
is preparing to renew their own transportation sales tax as
early as November 2002. Though not expiring until 2007, local
officials are hoping to begin what they acknowledge may be
several attempts at winning the needed 67 percent voter
approval for a package of projects that may look a lot
different from the one 58 percent of county voters approved in
1986. Still widely known as 'Measure C', the original half
cent sales tax increase has raised $686 million to help
construct a massive regional highway network originally
envisioned in the 1950s connecting the City of Fresno with its
surrounding suburbs.
Yet times are changing in the San Joaquin Valley's biggest
metro area, evidenced by such efforts as the Fresno Growth
Alternatives Alliance, a partnership among the Chamber of
Commerce, the Farm Bureau, the Business Council and others
that have started to recognize importance of preserving nearby
farmland and channeling future growth back towards cities and
suburbs. The state's high speed rail proposal has also
prompted the Fresno Council of Governments to demand a
downtown station, contradicting the rail authority's
recommendation of a stop five miles west of the city in what's
now prime farmland. The first step in the reauthorization of
the sales tax has been the formation of a 39-member steering
committee including a broad cross section of community
stakeholders, set to meet for the first time April 25th.
Besides the debate over the funding split among transportation
modes, the breakdown between the fast growing metro area
versus outlying towns and rural regions may also prove to be
equally contentious.
For more information visit http://www.fresnocog.com
or contact Kevin Hall at the Fresno County Transportation and
Land Use Coalition: hallmos@aol.com
.
Back to Top
CENTRAL VALLEY RESIDENTS ENVISION MORE
WALKABLE FUTURE
At a series of three STPP-sponsored town hall meetings held
in the Central Valley in early March, residents, planners and
local elected officials came together to develop strategies
for making their towns friendlier to pedestrians. National
walkable communities expert Dan Burden hosted a series of
neighborhood walking tours by day, followed by town hall-style
meetings in the evening to discuss results from the audits and
broader visions for more walkable streets. Burden used digital
photos of local streetscapes and intersections and conveyed
potential retrofit ideas by dropping in images of new
crosswalks, street trees, roundabouts, on-street parking and
bike lanes for the evening town hall audiences.
"It allows us to imagine it differently and see
exactly what a truly pedestrian-friendly environment would
look like," said Fresno City Councilmember Brian Calhoun.
Panels of local elected officials, traffic engineers, planners
and citizen advocates provided reactions to Burden's
presentations in each of the three town hall meetings, and
audience members followed with their own recommendations for
local pedestrian safety strategies. Ideas included a
pedestrian safety set aside in Fresno County's upcoming
transportation sales tax measure, a new walkable community
funding program in the Stanislaus County regional
transportation plan and an expansion of Sacramento's
neighborhood traffic calming program.
To find out more about the Central Valley pedestrian safety
forums contact STPP's Trinh Nguyen at 916.447.8880 or Julie
Rosenberg at 415.956.7835.
Back to Top
QUOTABLE
Published
Sunday, April 8, 2001,
in the San Jose Mercury News
Sharp drop in road building expected VTA
to focus instead on mass transit
By Gary Richards Mercury News
It's the end of the road in Santa Clara County.
After two decades of building more than 20 miles of new
roadway every year, the Valley Transportation Authority is
planning an average of just over one mile of fresh pavement
annually between 2006 and 2036.
"The era of building brand new highways is probably
over, here and everywhere else,'' said Steve Heminger of the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission. "We can still
expand bottlenecks and try to squeeze more capacity out of our
current roads, but there's only so much you can do.''
So the VTA is shifting its emphasis to mass transit. Of the
more than $8 billion that is expected to flow into the county
over 30 years, three of every four dollars is anticipated to
go to BART, light rail, buses and expanding Caltrain service.
What's left over is earmarked for roadways at the moment.
Back to Top
STATE BRIEFS
New U.S. Census numbers for California released at the end
of March validated that the state had become majority-minority
for the first time since the mid-nineteenth century, joining
New Mexico and Hawaii; census figures also showed San Benito,
Placer and Madera counties growing the fastest through the
1990s with population increases of 45%, 44% and 40%
respectively (SF Chron 3/30)...
The Bush administration ignored a March 8th deadline to
allow Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways, ostensibly
violating NAFTA and several other agreements that promised
resolution on the issue; a ruling is still expected sometime
soon and is expected to be highly controversial particularly
in border states like California (AP 3/9)...
The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC)
approved a $500,000 appropriation for a new Caltrain extension
south from Gilroy into Salinas; the funds will be used to
match capital money contained in the Governor's transportation
plan, local officials hope to initiate new service by August
2003 (Salinas Californian 3/29)...
An $11 million donation by the David and Lucile Packard
Foundation will help plans for the new UC Merced campus move
forward through the purchase of 7300 acres on an alternative
site one and a half miles away from the originally proposed
location that had been plagued by environmental issues
including the presence of vernal pools and the endangered
fairy shrimp; the campus is now proposed for the site of the
Merced Hills Golf Course northeast of Merced (Mod Bee 3/20)
The US Environmental Protection Agency gave a thumbs down
to a Bay Area plan to meet federal air quality goals in late
March, citing an excessive number of violations of standards
for ozone pollution; a coalition of environmental and social
justice groups filed suit in a US District Court urging the
EPA to reject the plan, regional agencies now have until June
to resubmit (SF Chron 3/22)...
Back to Top
|